Template:Did you know nominations/Nucella canaliculata
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nucella canaliculata, Semibalanus cariosus[edit]
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
Channeled dog winkle with thatched barnacles
- ... that the channeled dog winkle drills into shells of the thatched barnacle and injects a toxin to gain access to the soft parts?
- ALT1:... that the channeled dog winkle drills between the wall plates of the thatched barnacle and injects a muscle-relaxant toxin?
- Reviewed: Ficus coronulata
- Comment: Also reviewed second article from Template:Did you know nominations/Three Lives, Three Incarnations
Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 20:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC).
- Hi Cwmhiraeth, review follows:
- Nucella canaliculata: article 5x expanded 16 January; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; no copyright violation or overly close paraphrasing noticed; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article; hook is cited to a reliable source but I couldn't gain access to the right page via Google Books, happy to AGF that it supports the hook; image is used in article and looks OK at small scale; image is listed on Commons under a free license (I note that it is now shown on Flickr under a non-commercial licence but the Commons page states that it was reviewed in 2010 and confirmed to be under a free licence so I presume it has been changed since); QPQ has been carried out
- Semibalanus cariosus: new article 17 January; exceeds minimum length; well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; no copyright violation or overly close paraphrasing noticed from accessible sources; QPQ has been carried out.
Looks good to me. My preference is for ALT0 - Dumelow (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
