Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Old Chappaqua Historic District

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Old Chappaqua Historic District's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC).

Old Chappaqua Historic District

[edit]

Meeting house south elevation, 2013

5x expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self nominated at 20:59, 20 March 2013 (UTC).

I was going to fix it or check it but I've been surprisingly busy today. Thanks! Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
The final half of the hook (Continental Army casualties treated) was not inline cited by the end of the sentence in which the claim is made, as required by DYK rules; I've added the cite to avoid this hook being pulled later. Nina was quite right in not giving this the final tick absent that added inline citation; it isn't enough to note it here without adding it there. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks again. Whatevs. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 30 March 2013 (UTC)