Template:Did you know nominations/Old Tagalog
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Old Tagalog
[edit]- ... that the Laguna Copperplate Inscription had fragments of Old Tagalog?
Created by Philipandrew (talk). Nominated by Shhhhwwww!! (talk) at 22:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC).
New (3rd), long enough (though not very long), neutral as much as I'm familiar, unable to check for copyvio in offline sources, no QPQ necessary as not a self-nom. Hook doesn't have an immediate ref in article (see 3b). And two paragraphs are missing citations. Also it wouldn't hurt to add a book or article or two that use the phrase "old tagalog" for notability's sake. I didn't find much on the subject in Google, Google Books, or JSTOR. Please ping me if I don't respond. czar ♔ 08:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
No response czar ♔ 16:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
