The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Review Good to go! New article, timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Earwig's copy violation detector: Operation Puttur is clean. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. Alts are possible. Hook is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done. although article is not yet promoted.7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- n/a
Passes DYK checklist.
Good to go! New article, timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Earwig's copy violation detector: Operation Puttur is clean. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. Alts are possible. Hook is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done.