Template:Did you know nominations/Ophionereis reticulata
Appearance
The following is an archived discussion of Ophionereis reticulata's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC).
Ophionereis reticulata
[edit]- ... that unlike most other brittle stars, the reticulated brittle star (pictured) makes use of its tube feet during locomotion?
- Reviewed: Geastrum fimbriatum
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 12:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Article is new enough, long enough, and within policy (with plenty of well-formatted citations). The hook is short enough and interesting; its facts are also cited in the article. In this case, I believe that piping from the common, English name is better than using the latin Ophionereis reticulata in the hook, although others sometimes differ on this point (B3). I say, good to go! - ʈucoxn\talk 03:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)