Template:Did you know nominations/Outdoor Miner

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 15:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Outdoor Miner

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that "Outdoor Miner" by Wire was not performed on Top of the Pops because of suspected chart rigging?

• ALT1:...that "Outdoor Miner" by Wire was covered 19 times on a 2004 tribute album?
• Reviewed: Susan Stover

Created/expanded by Yorkshiresky (talk). Self-nominated at 15:20, 27 August 2016 (UTC).

• No issues found with article, ready for human review.
  • ✓ This article is new and was created on 14:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2764 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (4.8% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
  • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 94 characters
  • ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 68 characters
  • ✓ Yorkshiresky has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Susan Stover was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:01, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

• for Hook 0, for Hook 1. @Yorkshiresky: Per the robot, length, age, hook length, and citation throughout are all good. QPQ done. Hook 0 cited to ref 3 and mentioned in ref. Hook 1 cited to ref 7 and mentioned in ref. However, ref 7 should be duplicated at the previous sentence ("Unusually...of the song.") per DYK rule 3b. Also, I very slightly changed the wording in Hook 0 (removed contraction and added quotes around the song title). BobAmnertiopsis∴_ChatMe! 17:19, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

• Fixed citation as requested. Thanks! yorkshiresky (talk) 11:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• Both hooks good to go! BobAmnertiopsis∴_ChatMe! 17:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)