Template:Did you know nominations/Outgroup favoritism

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Outgroup favoritism

(

)

... that some socially disadvantaged groups will express favorable attitudes (and even preferences) toward social, cultural, or ethnic groups other than their own? Source: Jost, John T.; Banaji, Mahzarin R. (March 1994). "The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness". British Journal of Social Psychology. 33 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x. ISSN 0144-6665.
- Reviewed:

Created by Lcupal (talk). Self-nominated at 04:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Outgroup favoritism; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General eligibility:
New enough: - n
Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this article is not eligible for DYK. It was neither created nor expanded over five times its previously existing length within five days of nomination. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

CurryTime7-24, according to the article's history, it was finally moved to mainspace on December 1, four days prior to nomination. (I wouldn't count the premature move to mainspace and back to draft space in the prior week.) Please redo your review, since the article does appear eligible. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- New reviewer needed; prior reviewer has not returned in eleven days despite being active elsewhere. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - n
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems: - Will need reformatting so that it isn't a WP:SOB.

QPQ: None required.

Overall:

The significant uncited material is a major issue. As the nominator is a student editor who has not edited for a month, I'll give this a few days but it'll likely be rejected. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)