Template:Did you know nominations/P.S. Krøyer's paintings of Marie

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 03:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

P. S. Krøyer's paintings of Marie‎[edit]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that among P. S. Krøyer's paintings of Marie is a double self-portrait (pictured) in which they painted each other?

ALT1:... that the last of P. S. Krøyer's paintings of his wife Marie‎‎ shows her with her new lover?
Comment: For the original hook, the image is its own citation; The ALT is a bit sad I think.

Created by Ipigott (talk). Nominated by Belle (talk) at 13:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC).

I think the original hook is fine, especially if the picture can be maintained in the DYK display.--Ipigott (talk) 08:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: I moved the article to P. S. Krøyer's paintings of Marie and have amended the hook and credit templates accordingly. 97198 (talk) 05:34, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

new enough, plenty big enough, well-referenced though almost all sources in Danish (AGF on translation, paraphrasing not an issue). Even though obvious - can we get an inline cite for the caption then? Then we're okay. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

If it's the "new lover" that's bothering you, the ref I have added from Kristeligt Dagblad states: "... Marie Krøyer i 1902 indleder et forhold til den svenske komponist Hugo Alfven." (In 1902, Marie Krøyer began an affair with the Swedish composer Hugo Alfvén.) The Northern Light reference (in English but apparently not accessible online) also clearly documents the relationship in the context of the painting.--Ipigott (talk) 07:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

@Ipigott: I think Cas may have been referring to the need for a citation for the first hook, which is only mentioned in the article in an image caption. It would be ideal if the fact was mentioned in the actual body of the article with a citation (I'm not sure the painting itself can attest that it was a double self-portrait). 97198 (talk) 11:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

OK, I have now added a few words on the double portrait with a reference. Hope this is what is needed.--Ipigott (talk) 11:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

as hook now reffed. I don't think ALT1 is very interesting personally. Nice article. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)