Template:Did you know nominations/Pachycondyla aberrans

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Pachycondyla aberrans[edit]

(

)

... that the ant Pachycondyla aberrans was described from a headless adult of unknown gender? Source: "Holotype PIN 3429/104, lateral imprint of male or gyne without head and top of gaster" (Dlussky, G.M.; Rasnitsyn, A.P.; Perfilieva, K.S. (2015))

Reviewed: Tetragnatha montana

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 17:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC).

New enough, long enough, quality article, properly cited, hook is OK, everything OK. Good to go. (I would suggest to add information for general public to the article, that the type specimen is not female worker, but either male or gyne.) Snek01 (talk) 23:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Snek01: I would like to point out that your review does not mention a copyvio check (other than the vague "everything OK"). Ppp ery 11:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Everything OK within policy & no copyvio detected. Snek01 (talk) 14:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)