Template:Did you know nominations/Pan Am Flight 841

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 00:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Pan Am Flight 841[edit]

  • Comment: I am typing this on the fly and will probably reword it later, so feel free to fix it for clarity if any issues come up.

Created by Rich Farmbrough (talk) and General Ization (talk). Nominated by Ktr101 (talk) General Ization (talk) at 17:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC).

  • General Ization, the nominator, Ktr101, has just been banned from all Wikimedia sites, including this one. Did you want to take over the nomination on your own? So far as I can tell, you don't have five DYK nominations as yet, so no QPQ would be required. (Ktr101 would have owed a QPQ, given his nomination history.) Please let me know as soon as you can. If you don't wish to pursue it, I'll then arrange to have it closed. Thanks. (I'm asking you because as far as I can tell, Rich just created a template for the article with a couple of sentences of text only, while you wrote almost the entire thing, so it's your decision about whether to proceed, not his.) BlueMoonset (talk) 01:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: Yes, I'll be happy to nominate, or re-nominate, the article (though I do much prefer my ALT1 wording to the original proposal). How to proceed? General Ization Talk 01:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  • General Ization, you don't need to do anything at this point; I've adjusted the template page to show you as the nominator going forward. You should monitor the page so you can respond to any questions that might arise during the DYK review. Thank you for your quick response. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review needed; QPQ will not be required. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Hook is too long, please shorten it to under 200 characters. The hook is interesting and sourced in the article. This article is fascinating and I really enjoyed reading it and the sources. The article meets the critera for length, is within the DYK time scales and is written from a neutral perspective (I appreciate how difficult this must have been to do). General Ization, let me know if you are able to shorten the hook then I can approve this DYK ツStacey (talk) 12:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(Thanks for the kind words.) General Ization Talk 14:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • I like ALT2 - Good to go! ツStacey (talk) 17:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)