Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Bashutsky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 21:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Paul Bashutsky[edit]

Created by LouisAragon (talk). Self-nominated at 04:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough and long enough. I am approving the original hook but not ALT1, because that hook mentions multiple awards but the article does not (they are mentioned in the infobox, but need a reference). The hook facts have inline citations, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. I believe you have fewer than five DYKs and do not need to do a QPQ review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, but do not see any inline cites for the names of the wars he participated in. Yoninah (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I've just struck the original hook, which is 230 characters including spaces, far more than the maximum 200 allowed. Please come up with a shorter hook. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset:, * ALT2: ... that the Imperial Russian general of the infantry Paul Bashutsky served during numerous stages of the Napoleonic Wars? What do you think? - LouisAragon (talk) 22:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
@Yoninah:, just dropped a few more inline refs. Should be good now. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  • @LouisAragon: but you're saying the same thing. "X is Y" is not considered a hooky fact. Perhaps you could add more description to the article and build a hook around that? Yoninah (talk) 00:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah:, in theory there should be more than enough information in the article to build a hook around. Its just that I'm still pretty much a noob regarding this. Anyways, my last attempt. What about (ALT5 already)
  • Yes, that works! It also has a nice suggestiveness to it that the events were related. The hook ref is verified and cited inline. Rest of review per Cwmhiraeth. ALT5 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 14:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Haha, at last! Thanks for your time Yoninah :-) - LouisAragon (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)