Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Per Teodor Cleve

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Per Teodor Cleve

[edit]

Per Theodor Cleve

5x expanded by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 01:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Expanded from 1041 characters to 5711 starting March 14, and nominated for DYK the same day, satisfying length and date criteria. All text is sourced, however there are a few issues with the sources. Ref #3 used Wikipedia as its source and must be eliminated; all material sourced to this must be removed or citations to different sources must be supplied. I will assume good faith for ref #5. References #6 and #7 are the same, hosted at different websites; please merge them to use only one of these refs. Refs #1 and #6/7 claim Cleve became assistant professor in organic chemistry in 1968 and 1963 respectively; is there a reason you chose the former? Paragraph 2 of "Career" mentions "Några ammoniakaliska chromföreningar" involving compounds of chromium, but the latter is not mentioned in the source (it is in source #6/7 though, so perhaps add a citation to that also). I'll give benefit of doubt for refs #9 and #10 only because they supply information about the sources used to create their articles. Ref #15 does not appear to be a reliable source and should be eliminated from the article; please use a different source for the cited claims. The quotation "a sign of civilization and cultural progress that women were allowed to attain higher positions in society" is not something Cleve said; it is a statement by the source's author explaining the situation; the statement in the text should make this explicitly clear. The hook is fine, appears in the text, and is adequately sourced. The image is sourced from a book published in 1903, has a proper summary in the image file, and is decent at this resolution for use as a DYK image. Overall, there are only a few minor ref issues to resolve, and this is good to go. Mindmatrix 20:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Note: I forgot to mention that QPQ was completed. Mindmatrix 20:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • I have done all of this except for merging refs 5 and 6, which are two separate pages written by two different people. --Jakob (talk) 12:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • The two sources (ref 5 and ref 6) have identical text and are both written by Ole Bostrup (for ref 5, the name is listed just above the word "Bibliography"). Also, it appears you accidentally excised the wrong ref in one of your edits; you removed the "Lykknes, Opitz, Tiggelen" ref instead of the "Data Research Analyst" ref that I think is not reliable. Mindmatrix 13:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Hopefully it's better now. --Jakob (talk) 21:58, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Good to go. Mindmatrix 14:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)