Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Pilak, Tripura and Tripura Government Museum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Pilak, Tripura, Tripura Government Museum

[edit]
Tripura Government Museum
Tripura Government Museum

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 12:11, 2 October 2015 (UTC).

  • Will review the two articles shortly. Epic Genius (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  • So, basically I did a preliminary check, and it looks like both articles' prose sizes have been recently expanded. Pilak, Tripura, has been expanded 5 times, while Tripura Government Museum is brand-new. Epic Genius (talk) 19:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Nvvchar: Here is another alt. I'm not convinced that the current hook is catchy enough.
  • Otherwise, plagiarism/neutrality and citation concerns don't seem to be a problem. Epic Genius (talk) 21:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Review for Pilak, Tripura:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Invalid status "done" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

Review for Tripura Government Museum:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Invalid status "done" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

  • @Nvvchar: That new alt looks good. I'm just going to modify it a little grammatically.
  • Otherwise, it looks all good. QPQ is done, so basically good to go if you approve of ALT2/ALT3. Epic Genius (talk) 02:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks, @Epicgenius:. I agree with ALT3 which is a slight grammatical modification of ALT2.Nvvchar. 02:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Then I believe we're all set. Thank you for your contributions to these articles, @Nvvchar. I guess I'll wish these DYKs good luck. Epic Genius (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Epicgenius: Thanks. Please give a green tick of approval.Nvvchar. 04:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)