Template:Did you know nominations/Please Miss

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 10:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Please Miss

(
)

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 18:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC).

  • @Silver seren: New enough in mainspace and long enough. QPQ present. Earwig mostly catches quotes and the work title itself. The quote in the hook fact needs to be more clearly attributed to Publishers Weekly in the article and then I will approve. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Can you explain what you mean by more clearly, Sammi Brie? The quote is from the second sentence in the lede, which also has an in-line citation to the Publishers Weekly reference. SilverserenC 23:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
  • @Silver seren: The article needs to state inline that the "paradigmatic concept of the penis" wording came from the magazine review. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
  • It's in quotation marks in the article. Doesn't that inherently imply it's from the connected reference, as are any quotes used in the article? SilverserenC 23:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Okay, Sammi Brie, I've added a specific name reference in that sentence to the source of the quote. SilverserenC 00:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • I'm just being picky because it's been an issue with a few hooks of late. Approved. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Please_Miss&oldid=1137776924"