Template:Did you know nominations/Polish settlement in the Philippines
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 21:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Polish settlement in the Philippines[edit]
- ... that Polish settlement in the Philippines has been recorded as early as the seventeenth century?
- Comment: Nominating the article along with Philippines–Poland relations, Embassy of the Philippines, Warsaw and Filipinos in Poland. It would be nice if the four may be grouped together in a single DYK block, if that is possible.
Created by Sky Harbor (talk). Self nominated at 03:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC).
No QPQ. It seems you didn't do QPQ for any of these four, and you had 5 DYKs before nominating any of them. Do four QPQs and I will look at this (and Philippines–Poland relations). Oreo Priest talk 03:58, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- I normally refrain from reviewing DYKs (not really confident in my reviewing skills), but all right. You're on. ;) --Sky Harbor (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, done. Reviewed Lily Neo, Ahmet Abakay, Ffordd Pen Llech and Tower of Kurt Pasha. --Sky Harbor (talk) 08:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, good. I will do this and the other in the next few days, but I can't guarantee the nomination won't expire by then. Oreo Priest talk 14:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, done. Reviewed Lily Neo, Ahmet Abakay, Ffordd Pen Llech and Tower of Kurt Pasha. --Sky Harbor (talk) 08:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- I normally refrain from reviewing DYKs (not really confident in my reviewing skills), but all right. You're on. ;) --Sky Harbor (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
QPQ satisfied; full review needed. (Nomination will not expire waiting for a reviewer.) BlueMoonset (talk) 19:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Review:
New enough, long enough, QPQ done, reasonably well referenced. The hook is interesting and an appropriate length. The hook is not so much cited as it is proven true by a citation; I think this is completely reasonable. Good to go. Oreo Priest talk 04:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
