Template:Did you know nominations/Polistes chinensis
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 13:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Polistes chinensis[edit]
- ... that Polistes chinensis cannibalize their larvae in prey- and honey-limited conditions?
5x expanded by Micah.Steinbrecher (talk). Self nominated at 20:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC).
- Began review. New enough, long enough. Expanded 5x. from 689 chars (113 words) on 18 Octber2014 to 8673 characters (1393 words) on 21 October 2014. AshLin (talk) 06:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Some improvements made. Each paragraph must be cited inline. Please replace the fact templates with citations.
- The hook fact sentence needs to be cited inline.
- The Saigo reference (13) is incomplete. Which journal?
- Some copyvios as regards grouping of words here. Some word groups recur. May please rectify. @Micah.Steinbrecher:
Another review needed - improvements made. Rcsprinter123 (negotiate) @ 19:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook fact has an inline citation. The article is neutral and although the article uses some technical terms and phrases that are used in the sources, I did not find that this was excessive. The main examples of similar phrases, illustrated by Ashlin above, were in the titles of scientific papers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
