Template:Did you know nominations/Poquita Ropa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Poquita Ropa[edit]

Created/expanded by Hahc21 (talk). Self nom at 14:06, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

  • As per Eligibility criteria. Has not been newly created or expanded fivefold within the past five days. Expansion appears to have started 11 May 2012. Sorry. Eshlare (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I nominated 5to Piso which was expanded those same days, and per consensus and WP:IAR it was promoted. I asked if i could nominate this, and i was given the green light to do it. Thanks. --—Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 17:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I would like to clarify something. DYK guidelines allow anyone to nominate any article. You asked. I only stated the obvious Of course! Just set it up as a new nomination template by itself. Once something is placed in nomination, it's up to whoever reviews it. Maile66 (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I have to agree, with regret, that this is ineligible for DYK. Hahc21 in fact created the original article, in September 2010, which is another reason not to make an exception. There's some wiggle room on the 5 days, and work in a sandbox that is then transferred to mainspace within 5 days of nomination is absolutely eligible, but DYK is intended to show new articles or newly expanded articles. Hahc21, hope to see another nomination from you soon; this time nominate it on the 5th or 6th day, and if it's a new article, consider creating it in a sandbox if it may take you longer than 5 days, so you don't have to rush. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Support consensus view that there was no five fold expansion. Even generously going back to this, it doesn't even appear to have two fold expansion. --LauraHale (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Ok. No problem =). XD