Template:Did you know nominations/Port Snettisham
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:35, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Port Snettisham
[edit]... that the Port Snettisham Iron Ore Property is located in Port Snettisham and includes 49 contiguous properties?
Created by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 05:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
-
Is a "claim" a "property"? I'm not at all sure the two are equivalent, which would make the hook (and matching sentence in the article) problematic. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- looking again..I guess we could easily change the last word in the hook to "claims"...but actually thinking about it, it's not a very interesting hook. The geography suggests we can come up with something better. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the Taku people fish for sockeye salmon at Port Snettisham? --Rosiestep (talk) 05:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 is fine. Thanks.--Nvvchar. 05:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
-
- Can we have a certification that the hook is properly sourced, etc., along with a new tick? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
-
- Thanks. Striking original hook as problematic so it isn't accidentally selected. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)