Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Pre-Maori settlement of New Zealand theories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Pre-Maori settlement of New Zealand theories's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 09:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC).

Pre-Maori settlement of New Zealand theories

[edit]
  • Reviewed: Not necessary, not a self nom

Created by Trinder1 (talk), Kleinzach (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 08:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough and long enough. I have removed the word "Vikings" from the hook as, though they are mentioned in the article lead (unreferenced), they are not mentioned in the body of the article. I am also editing the article to remove this uncited claim (the author of the article has been blocked indefinitely). Otherwise, the hook fact is well referenced.Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)