Template:Did you know nominations/Procedural impropriety in Singapore administrative law
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Procedural impropriety in Singapore administrative law[edit]
- ... that a 2006 Singapore case says the test for apparent bias, a type of procedural impropriety, involves asking if a fair-minded person would have a reasonable suspicion that a fair trial is impossible?
- Reviewed: Life (Heo Young-saeng album) and Bitch I'm Madonna
- Comment: This is a two-article hook.
- "Procedural impropriety in Singapore administrative law" was created by moving a draft in a sandbox into the main article space on 18 July 2015. The hook is evidenced by footnotes 34 and 35.
- "Re Shankar Alan s/o Anant Kulkarni" was created by moving a draft in a sandbox into the main article space on 26 July 2015.
Created by Beatriceyeo (talk), Ivanathanlee (talk), Jameswwm (talk), Keshayaysl (talk), Wz.gan.2011 (talk), Aliciatkh (talk), Elllfong (talk), Jasselynseet (talk), and Lovehappyweekend (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 18:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC).
These two articles are new enough and long enough. The hook facts are the basis of the articles and have inline citations. The articles are neutral but the references are mostly offline so it is not possible for me to assess whether the precise legal language has any policy issues such as close paraphrasing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
