The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: None required.
Overall: The article is thorough, neutral, and interesting although I feel a reason for the prize's discontinuation would provide some closure. Otherwise, the hook is short and interesting. The copyvio detector shows 42% which is expected as the article incoporates direct quotes from sources. Some sources are also offline books so assumed in good faith. Although my DYK Credit tool is bugging, I've checked your talk page and cannot find evidence of having more than 5 DYK credits so QPQ is waived. All in all, it's a good article and hook that passes & sure to get clicks. Droodkin (talk) 10:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
The article is thorough, neutral, and interesting although I feel a reason for the prize's discontinuation would provide some closure. Otherwise, the hook is short and interesting. The copyvio detector shows 42% which is expected as the article incoporates direct quotes from sources. Some sources are also offline books so assumed in good faith. Although my DYK Credit tool is bugging, I've checked your talk page and cannot find evidence of having more than 5 DYK credits so QPQ is waived. All in all, it's a good article and hook that passes & sure to get clicks. Droodkin (talk) 10:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)