Template:Did you know nominations/Ratih Hardjono

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 17:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Ratih Hardjono[edit]

  • ... that Ratih Hardjono connected her wedding with corruption, collusion, and nepotism?
  • ALT1:... that former Indonesian State Secretary Ratih Hardjono helped build the first civilian presidential office in 35 years?

Created/expanded by Rosiestep (talk), Crisco 1492 (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 06:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Ohconfucius ¡digame! Ohconfucius ¡digame! Ohconfucius ¡digame!
Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Ohconfucius ¡digame! Ohconfucius ¡digame! Ohconfucius ¡digame! Ohconfucius ¡digame! Ohconfucius ¡digame! Ohconfucius ¡digame! Ohconfucius ¡digame!
  • Citation of the hook: I am uncertain as to the suitability of the source used to cite the hook. It seems to be a puff-piece published on the website of a political organisation that I suspect might not be independent of the subject. Having another source would be great. I have given the article a light copyedit, and it is otherwise good to go. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 09:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Otherwise, the original may be good enough. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:41, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I'd like some feedback on the quality of this source, which also supports ALT1. This looks a bit more reliable (look at the "Panelists" tab) Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  • From experience and gut feel, bios like that one in ozmate are rarely properly fact-checked. They are often supplied by the subject. It seems that the factoid you need to cite should be easy enough to source, and I am surprised at the apparent difficulty in finding one that states that assertion unequivocally. ABC is generally considered reliable, though, and adequate for our purposes.

Good to go. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)