Template:Did you know nominations/Re Bristol South-East Parliamentary Election

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Re Bristol South-East Parliamentary Election

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Re Bristol South-East Parliamentary Election held that Tony Benn was unduely elected to the House of Commons as he was a hereditary peer and because his opponent had told the electorate he was disqualified? Source: BBC
  • ALT1:... that Re Bristol South-East Parliamentary Election found that votes for Tony Benn were "thrown away" as he was disqualified from sitting in the House of Commons as a hereditary peer? (Source: New Statesman)

• Reviewed: Llamatron
• Comment: Open to any other hooks that people think could be better

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 10:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC).

• Arricle is new and long enough. It is neutral and well sourced with inline citations. For the offline reference and the source by ref #2, which I cannot access, I AGF. Similarities reported by "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" are not noteworthy. Hook (I prefer ALT 1) is well-formatted and is interesting. Its fact is cited inline by a law text. QPQ was done. Good to go. CeeGee 11:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)