Template:Did you know nominations/Richard W. Conway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Richard W. Conway

Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self-nominated at 11:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC).

  •  Reviewing... Howard the Duck (talk) 02:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
    • Article:
      1. Newness: Green tickY Created on October 8, nominated on October 15; within the 7-day limit.
      2. Length: Green tickY 12788 characters, well more than the 1500 minimum.
      3. Within policy: Green tickY Earwig says it is "Violation Unlikely". Possible "violations" were proper names so I'd give that a pass. This is neutral, has inline citations. AGF on ref #3, "An Experimental Investigation of Scheduling for Single-stage Production" as it seems to be unavailable offline? There also quite a few which are not linked, and are linked but are mostly abstracts but I'd AGF those.
    • Hook:
      • Format: Green tickY Both are less than 200 characters and meet the guidelines:
      • Content: Green tickY I prefer ALT1 as more interesting and more specific than the generalities in ALT0.
    • Other:
      • QPQ:  Done
      • Image: Not applicable
    • This is good to go, with personal preference on ALT1. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)