Template:Did you know nominations/River bank failure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Harrias talk 16:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

River bank failure[edit]

Moved to mainspace by Zandra619 (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 19:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough and long enough, and it utilizes appropriate sources which are internally cited within the text. There are no copyvios, and the hook's content is sourced and verifiable. A QPQ review is not required. I've also added relevant categories to the article. -- Caponer (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm concerned that some of the phrasing in this article is too close to that of its sources. Compare for example "Pore water pressure in the saturated bank reduces the frictional shear strength of the soil and increases sliding forces. This type of failure is most common in fine grained soils because they cannot drain as rapidly" with "The pore water pressure in the bank reduces frictional shear strength of the soil and increases sliding forces by adding weight to the soil mass. This type of failure tends to occur in fine-grained soils that do not drain rapidly". There are also some instances of the source being misinterpreted: for example, the sentence "If the cohesionless soil is at the toe of the bank, these layers are protected by the layers of cohesive soil" is supported by a source that says "Where cohesionless soil is not at the toe of the bank, the layers of cohesionless soil are protected by adjacent layers of cohesive soils" (my emphasis). Nikkimaria (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I have found that Zandra619 is likely doing exams, and so not giving priority to this. But perhaps if it waits a week it can be sorted out. The course instructor is keen to get this fixed! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
No activity on this in over two weeks. Harrias talk 16:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
I will fix the close paraphrasing concerns here and misrepresentation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)