Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Seyfarth (scientist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Robert Seyfarth (scientist)

[edit]
Female Chacma baboon with infant (Botswana)
Female Chacma baboon with infant (Botswana)
  • ... that according to primatologists Robert Seyfarth and Dorothy Cheney, successful baboons use Jane Austen strategies: "be nice to your relatives and get in with the high-ranking relatives"? Source: University of Delaware Newsletter, 2009.
  • Reviewed: Dipolydora commensalis and Neanthes fucata (1 DYK for 2 articles)
  • Comment: Seyfarth and Cheney were married, lifelong collaborators and distinguished scientists. Cheney (who has had an article since May) recently died, so it would be nice to include her article in the DYK for Seyfarth's, if that is OK.

Created/expanded by HouseOfChange (talk). Self-nominated at 22:30, 23 November 2018 (UTC).

  • Comment: while Cheney can have a non-bold link in the hook, as her article is neither new nor newly 5x expanded (nor newly listed as a Good Article, a formal process that would take far too long for this nomination and would require further beefing up of the article, I believe, to meet the GA criteria), the link cannot be bolded since the article isn't eligible for DYK. I've adjusted the hook bolding, and removed Jlviegas from the credits since they do not appear to have made any edits to the Seyfarth article. Sorry for the bad news. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
  • This interesting article is new enough and long enough. The image is appropriately licensed, the hook facts are sourced inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright / close paraphrasing issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)