Template:Did you know nominations/Rodrigo Hernan Lloreda Caicedo
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Several issues (see below)
Rodrigo Hernan Lloreda Caicedo, Álvaro Lloreda Caicedo[edit]
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that Álvaro Lloreda Caicedo, his son Rodrigo Hernan Lloreda Caicedo, and his son's son Francisco José Lloreda Mera have all served as Ambassadors of Colombia?
Created/expanded by Mijotoba (talk). Self nom at 08:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Most of the three articles' sources are in Spanish, but appear to support the content. The Who's Who source for one is not fully searchable online. It might be good to try to find some articles in English that apply to these men, as a courtesy to readers of the English-language Wikipedia.
- Hook - OK, agree with nominator's suggestion.
- Issue: The article for Rodrigo Hernan Lloreda Caicedo does not have a cited source for his service as Ambassador, although dates for his two months in 1986 are noted in the Infobox. I added a mentiion of the service in the content of the article; it was not listed before.) As the hook is dependent on the fact being sourced for each of the three men, the DYK cannot be approved until such a cite is found.Parkwells (talk) 02:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Length - Álvaro Lloreda Caicedo is a stub and less than 1500 characters long (it only has 800 plus without spaces. It needs to be expanded to at least 1500 characters long, per guidelines. If this can't be done, perhaps you could renominate Rodrigo Hernan Lloreda CAicedo and have a hook that deals with two generations. Parkwells (talk) 01:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Parkwells (talk) 14:57, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
please put this out of it neglected state. One article is too short and still is, and the hook is not supported in the article, and this has been given plenty of time to be remediated. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
