Template:Did you know nominations/Roses (Krøyer)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Roses (painting)[edit]

(

)

... that Roses (pictured) by P.S. Krøyer was donated anonymously to the Skagens Museum in 2008 after almost 100 years in private ownership?

Comment: Was a redirect, so DYK check is lying to you (sort of) if it says it isn't new. My first article at DYK so no QPQ is necessary but I have hundreds in the bank (nuh-nuh [pokes out tongue]).

Created by Belle (talk). Self nominated at 10:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Very nice work and ticks all boxes. Above QPQ comment noted but meh. Moondyne (talk) 04:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Reviewers are asked to give more details of what they checked in an article, in accordance with DYK review instructions. Also, every paragraph needs at least one citation per DYK rules, which the first paragraph under Painting lacks. Yoninah (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

"A rule of thumb for DYK is a minimum of one citation per paragraph" The article is well referenced with important aspects cited. Length is OK, I saw no sign of plagiarism, although several references are in Danish. The hook itself is cited here. It is perfectly fit for DYK, IMHO. Moondyne (talk) 01:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

I've added a ref to that paragraph anyway (it was disconnected when I split the section). Sorry about the Danish sources, but it will help you practice for watching Borgen or The Killing if the subtitles break. Can you retick (that's a real word; yes, it is) please, Moondyne, or the promoters will ignore this. Belle (talk) 01:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)