Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Gottesman
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 18:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ruth Gottesman
- ... that tuition at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine is free thanks to a $1 billion donation by Ruth Gottesman?
- ALT1 ... that Ruth Gottesman donated $1 billion to ensure free tuition to all students at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine?
Converted from a redirect by Muboshgu (talk) and Smallbones (talk). Nominated by Muboshgu (talk) at 18:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ruth Gottesman; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Doing... ミラP@Miraclepine 21:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- None - Interesting:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
@Muboshgu: Earwig has a 70.2% match with https://mullbio.com/ruth-levy-gottesman/, but it's apparently one of these mirror sites that copy from enwiki. Otherwise, the article looks good and I prefer ALT1 which sounds less promotional, but the hooks don't have a ref attached to them. Cite the hooks and you're good to go. ミラP@Miraclepine 21:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Miraclepine, I'm not sure what you mean by "the hooks don't have a ref attached to them". It's the final sentence of the "Philanthropy" section. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: I'm aware they're cited on the nominated article; I actually meant the hooks on this nomination's page. However, since the guidelines (particularly WP:DYKHOOKCITE) don't actually require the refs to be attached on the nomination page,
both hooks with preference for the less promotional-sounding ALT1. ミラP@Miraclepine 22:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ah I see. I often do reference the hook in the nomination template, but in a short article like this, I sometimes don't. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Miraclepine and Muboshgu: Wondering about the high Earwig score. The entire philanthropy section shows as w4w. Here is the source which was compared and I do not know if they copied us. Bruxton (talk) 18:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Bruxton, the "Muwado" page is dated March 1. Our page was created and nom'd here February 26-29. Also, note that where the "Muwado" piece text overlaps with ours, there are quotation marks. There's
Read this: “With her husband David ...
and"When David died in 2022..."
with quotation marks. They copied this from us and I think that the quotation marks are a lame way of acknowledging that. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Bruxton, the "Muwado" page is dated March 1. Our page was created and nom'd here February 26-29. Also, note that where the "Muwado" piece text overlaps with ours, there are quotation marks. There's
- @Miraclepine and Muboshgu: Wondering about the high Earwig score. The entire philanthropy section shows as w4w. Here is the source which was compared and I do not know if they copied us. Bruxton (talk) 18:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ah I see. I often do reference the hook in the nomination template, but in a short article like this, I sometimes don't. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: I'm aware they're cited on the nominated article; I actually meant the hooks on this nomination's page. However, since the guidelines (particularly WP:DYKHOOKCITE) don't actually require the refs to be attached on the nomination page,
