Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Rivera Marin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 23:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Ruth Rivera Marin[edit]

Created by Nvvchar (talk) and SusunW (talk). Nominated by SusunW (talk) at 03:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC).

  • Just a quick note that I moved the article to Ruth Rivera Marín (with the correct accent) and have updated the links and credit templates here as such. 97198 (talk) 10:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Review new enough (article was nominated within 7 days of creation); long enough; neutral and has plenty of citations to reliable sources; query on the fact in hook - the article states that the publication has evolved into one of the most etc etc but doesn't specify that that evolution happened under Marin's editorship. Maybe the original source states that, but it has been lost in translation? SusunW and Nvvchar could you confirm and/or edit either article or hook to clarify? Thanks! (BTW, new reviewer here, tips/advice welcome!) MurielMary (talk) 09:53, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Hey MurielMary Thanks for the review. I think I fixed it. Notebook was only printed from 1961-1967, thus she was the only editor. I added a statement and citation to the article. Source says "Los Cuadernos, 20 en total, fueron editados originalmente, entre 1961 y 1967 por el entonces Departamento de Arquitectura del INBA" (The Notebooks, 20 in total, were originally published between 1961 and 1967 by the then Department of Architecture of the INBA). Before you sign off on the review, don't forget to verify completion of QPQ and state that there is no image. Congrats on a review. Good to see you here! SusunW (talk) 15:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, SusunW that's great! I'm not sure what the procedure is for QPQ though?? MurielMary (talk) 07:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Review complete No image for this DYK. GTG (my first review so please advise if something isn't correctly done, thanks) MurielMary (talk) 07:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

  • @MurielMary: a QPQ is the article the nominator reviewed along with this nomination (see above line, "Reviewed"). You need to check that all the DYK criteria were checked in the QPQ as well. I am verifying that the QPQ was done properly. Yoninah (talk) 19:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks @Yoninah:! MurielMary (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)