Template:Did you know nominations/Saar status referendum, 1935
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Saar status referendum, 1935[edit]
- ... that despite Georges Clemenceau's claim that Saar contained 150,000 Frenchmen, less than 1% of the Saar's voters supported a French annexation of the Saar?
5x expanded by Futurist110 (talk). Self nominated at 02:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC).
Expanded 5x, large enough, hook cited, no copyvio found. I can't see any QPQ, though (which is the only reason I haven't given it a 
). The hook is short enough and interesting, but a large portion of it is bold/linked - although that might just be a personal preference. Is there a better way to phrase it (maybe including the word 'referendum')? (I'm very new here - maybe a second opinion would be good.)
- ALT1... that despite Georges Clemenceau's claim that Saar contained 150,000 Frenchmen, less than 1% of the Saar's voters supported a French annexation of the Saar in a 1935 referendum? Bilorv (talk) 11:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- I have now did this QPQ here -- Template:Did you know nominations/Drupad Borgohain -- for this DYK? nomination of mine. Also, I approve of the ALT1 hook for this DYK? nomination. Please let me know if there are any additional problems with this DYK? nomination of mine. Thank you. Futurist110 (talk) 22:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Also, here is another possible hook for this:
- ALT2... that despite Georges Clemenceau's claim that Saar contained 150,000 Frenchmen, just 2,124 of the Saar's voters supported a French annexation of the Saar in a 1935 referendum?
- This alternate hook uses raw numbers, as opposed to percentages, for both Clemenceau's claim and for the actual pro-France vote. This, in turn, allows for a better comparison of these two things. Thoughts? Futurist110 (talk) 22:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Also, here is another possible hook for this:
- I have now did this QPQ here -- Template:Did you know nominations/Drupad Borgohain -- for this DYK? nomination of mine. Also, I approve of the ALT1 hook for this DYK? nomination. Please let me know if there are any additional problems with this DYK? nomination of mine. Thank you. Futurist110 (talk) 22:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Reiterating the original icon, to keep this from showing up as approved—the last-used icon is picked up by automated processed—since the ALT hooks still need reviewing. (It's a good point, that shorter bolded text is better than a huge phrase; I'd suggest a minor change, placing the "a" before the bolded "1935 referendum", rather than in it.) BlueMoonset (talk) 04:46, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- I approve of all of the ALT hooks here. Any changes which one thinks are necessary to make to the hooks are fine with me. Futurist110 (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- (I've removed the "a" from bold in ALT1.) Personally, I have little preference between ALT1 and ALT2 - if pressed, I'd have to go for ALT2. What happens now? Do we have to pick one before giving it a tick? (This is my first time reviewing.) Bilorv (talk) 08:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- How about ALT3? Would ALT3 be a good hook for this DYK? nomination? Futurist110 (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Shouldn't the hooks use "fewer", not "less", as voters are countable? Number 57 11:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- I'd say it depends how you divide the sentence: it should be "less than 1%" but "fewer than X voters". I read it as "...[numerical figure] of the Saar's voters...", as opposed to "less than [countable noun]". I'm usually quite pedantic when it comes to "less" and "fewer", but I didn't pick up on that. Bilorv (talk) 11:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Number 57 is right, "fewer" is correct. "Less than" is for a quantity, "fewer than" for a number. One per cent (one in a hundred) is clearly a number. Moonraker (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying this. Personally, though, I think that ALT2 might be the best hook to use here. However, again, I myself am fine with any hook being used here. Futurist110 (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Here is a minor change based on BlueMoonset's recommendation:
- ALT3... that despite Georges Clemenceau's claim that Saar contained 150,000 Frenchmen, just 2,124 of the Saar's voters supported a French annexation of the Saar in a 1935 referendum?
Futurist110 (talk) 05:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Second opinion requested by original (new) reviewer; a confirming check that everything looks okay would be appreciated. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, someone else should really look at this DYK? nomination whenever possible. After all, it has already been almost three days since this comment. Futurist110 (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- It has already been another six days, and I am still waiting to someone else to review this DYK? nomination of mine. Futurist110 (talk) 00:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, someone else should really look at this DYK? nomination whenever possible. After all, it has already been almost three days since this comment. Futurist110 (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2014 (UTC)