Template:Did you know nominations/Sahraa Karimi
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sahraa Karimi
Sahraa Karimi
- ... that Sahraa Karimi (pictured) is the first and only woman in Afghanistan who has a PhD in film? Source: "Karimi is the first and the only woman in Afghanistan who has a PhD in cinema and filmmaking. " (TOLONews)
- Reviewed:Women's Reserve Ambulance Corps
- Comment: I am not too sure about the image copyright, and would request someone to check it properly. Also, this is my first article directly related to Afghanistan, the source used -TOLOnews, seems like a decent source for this part of the world.
Created by DiplomatTesterMan (talk). Self-nominated at 16:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC).
Is long enough (just about) and in date. QPQ has been done. TOLOnews seems reliable barring any reason not to think it is. Image is claimed as PD, no expert but it does not seem to appear anywhere else on line at the moment, so AGF, unless anyone has reason to think otherwise. Hook is sourced and supported pretty much verbatim in the source, and is definitely interesting. There are occasionally concerns over dating when it comes to claims such as this, I think wording like "is the first and only woman, as of 2019, in Afghanistan". But this is only if other people bring it up as a concern. Nothing particularly significant on the copyvio detector. There is a paragraph ending without a cite, and the birthdate is mentioned in the infobox, but not mentioned or sourced in the article, and the Works section is unsourced - bibliographies and filmographies have been pulled up for being unsourced in the past. Can these be fixed? If so, this should be good to go. Spokoyni (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. As for the points raised, will try fixing them.
Working DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 15:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC) - Spokoyni, the paragraph without a cite
, birthdate in infobox , works section sourced . I've made the changes pointed out. Anything else that needs to be done? Thanks. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 09:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. As for the points raised, will try fixing them.
