Template:Did you know nominations/Schmuck v. United States
The following is an archived discussion of Schmuck v. United States's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Schmuck v. United States[edit]
- ... that some Schmuck tried to get the U.S. Supreme Court to let him off for mail fraud because all he did was roll back odometers?
- Reviewed: Jon Challinor
- Comment: This is for April Fool's, so it's in the queue there as well.
Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nominated at 16:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC).
Looks good to me. Created four days before nom, so new enough. Easily long enough and looks to be sourced well. See no problem with content. Hook seems suitable to me for April Fool's Day. All in all I think this is good to go. —Cliftonian (talk) 16:19, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
