Template:Did you know nominations/Scott Lutrus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Scott Lutrus[edit]

(edit nomination page)

Created by Cmadler (talk), The ed17 (talk). Nominated by The ed17 (talk) at 17:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

I'll suggest a couple ALTs that are more focused and also link to the relevant section of star (classification). I don't think it's that uncommon for two-star recruits to be signed as undrafted free agents; for example, I don't know his star ranking (if he even was rated), but Clay Matthews III got no I-A offers and started college as a walk-on. To me the more interesting point is the immediate turnaround from recruit ranking to collegiate performance. So:
I prefer ALT2, because giving the years highlights the immediacy. cmadler (talk) 13:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Creation date, length, and referencing all good. I agree with Cmadler that ALT2 is the best, so let's go with that one. One comment to add: The section of the star (classification) article that deals with college football doesn't discuss the significance of each star rating. The place where you'll find that is in the "Terminology" section of recruiting (college athletics); I changed the link in the hook to point to that location. — Dale Arnett (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2011 (UTC)