Template:Did you know nominations/Section 21 notice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Section 21 notice[edit]

  • ... that the default tenancy in England and Wales allows landlords to evict tenants without giving a reason? Source: See Shelter England & Shelter Cymru link in lede and Background
  • ALT1 ... that default tenancy in England and Wales gives landlords the statutory right to evict tenants without giving a reason? Source: See Shelter England & Shelter Cymru link in lede and Background

Improved to Good Article status by KTC (talk). Self-nominated at 15:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC).


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Length checks. 18799 characters (3266 words) "readable prose size". promoted to Good Article status on February 1, 2019; DYK nom 7 February 2019 (6 days < 7 days, OK). Well sourced as one would expect for a GA with several cites for every para. QPQ done by nominator. Neutrality evaluated by QPQ reviewer and looks OK to me. Hook cited and 17 words long. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Toolforge is down so I'm AGFing on the copyvio/plagiarism issues. It's passed GA and we'd hope they notice there. Hook interesting enough to make me take a look but perhaps not quite colloquial English for U.S. readers; if I think of something better I'll write a tweaked ALT. Passes. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Toolforge is back up; my interpretation of Earwig's copyvio detector results is that there was sufficient rephrasing to annul plagiarism/copyvio concerns. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)