Template:Did you know nominations/Selection shadow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Selection shadow[edit]

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self nominated at 12:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC).

  • That's... an interesting article. New enough, long enough, interesting enough hook, copyright and referencing looks fine. However, I don't see it explicitly stated that aging is considered non-adaptive under this model. We do have "This results in beneficial mutations not being selected for if they only have a positive result later in life, along with later in life deleterious mutations not being selected against.", which one would expect to be what you're referring to, but the only time you use the word "adaptive" is when you oppose the selection shadow with the "Death by Design" model.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
  • The first source discusses it, I just didn't mention it in the lede. That's been remedied now. Better? SilverserenC 11:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Except the hook fact should have a citation immediately after it, not in the next sentence. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Okay, done, though that seems rather silly. SilverserenC 16:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I know, rather silly, but it's better to be safe than to have this removed from prep just for that little issue. Good to go now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)