Template:Did you know nominations/Silaum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 09:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Silaum[edit]

Silaum silaus

Created by Acather96 (talk). Self nominated at 22:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC).

  • The source used does not say "uncertainty" is a possible etymology, it states that it is uncertain of the etymology. (Note that this error is also present in Silaum silaus). I am also uncertain of the reliability of the Burton reference. Resolute 03:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Whoops, that 'uncertainty' error was embarrassing, though I've fixed that in both articles now. The Burton reference seems reasonably reliable - he has experience in the field, it is not original research but only information synthesized from books on the subject, the website is the most comprehensive website on the Apiacea family in GB. I hope this satisfies your concerns. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 12:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Should be ok now for Alt 1. Certainly new and long enough, hook fact supported. Shame about that error, the original hook did catch my eye. The source I mentioned does look extremely amateur, but it does also provide a solid bibliography Resolute 23:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)