Template:Did you know nominations/Sinaloan mastiff bat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:29, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Sinaloan mastiff bat[edit]

  • ... that the males and females of Sinaloan mastiff bat can't be differentiated on the basis of the breadth of their braincases?

5x expanded by Anaxial (talk). Nominated by Skr15081997 (talk) at 13:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC).

  • This is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The main source is a journal article that requires subscription. My quibble is with the hook, which is a negative statement that I consider uninteresting. What about:
I'm not allowed to approve a hook suggested by me. (I think this is a silly rule and slows down the review process. If instead of suggesting a hook, I had written "What about a hook referring to the scent glands?" and you had suggested ALT1, I could have approved it.) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

New review needed for the ALT hook.--Skr15081997 (talk) 10:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Article 5x expanded in good time, offline references are taken agf. There are no identifiable policy issues seen. Good to go on the alt hook.--Kevmin § 02:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
@Kevmin: You need to put the pale blue tick. Thanks for the review!--Skr15081997 (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Oops, done.--Kevmin § 12:57, 1 August 2014 (UTC)