Overall: The article was about 2,500 bytes pre-expansion. In order to qualify through 5x expansion, that would mean that it needs to be about 12,500 bytes post-expansion. From my count, it looks like its about 5,000 currently, well short of the requirement unfortunately. Am I missing something? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
I mistakenly believed that a fully unsourced article would qualify for DYK if it was later cited and expanded. Since the article had been unsourced for almost 20 years, I decided to work on it. I'm not sure why I thought this was a rule, perhaps it was an old one? I can't seem to find any current guidelines supporting this, so it looks like the article isn’t suitable for DYK after all. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 13:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- ?
The article was about 2,500 bytes pre-expansion. In order to qualify through 5x expansion, that would mean that it needs to be about 12,500 bytes post-expansion. From my count, it looks like its about 5,000 currently, well short of the requirement unfortunately. Am I missing something? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)