Template:Did you know nominations/Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev was a Kresta II-class cruiser which was initially designed to counter NATO Ballistic missile submarines but was changed to destroy Attack submarines instead? Source: Hampshire, Edward (2017). Soviet Cold War Guided Missile Cruisers. New Vanguard 242. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4728-1740-2. Page 5 , Friedman, Norman (1995). "Soviet Union 1947–1991: Russian Federation and Successor States 1991–". In Chumbley, Stephen (ed.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships, 1947–1995. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. pp. 337–426. ISBN 978-1-55750-132-5. Page 345
  • ALT1: ... that Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev was named to honour Russian Civil War commander Vasily Chapayev? Source: Dygalo, Viktor Ananʹevich; Tsvetkov, Igor Fedorovich (1993). Откуда и что на флоте пошло [Where and What Went in the Fleet] (in Russian). Moscow: Progress. ISBN 978-5-01003-952-3. Page 109.
  • ALT2: ... that Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev was ordered to sail on 24 December 1976 but it's crew refused to comply causing the removal of its senior officers? Source: Averin, A.B. (2007). Адмиралы и маршалы. Корабли проектов 1134 и 1134А [Admirals and Marshals: Project 1134 and 1134A Ships] (in Russian). Moscow: Voennaya Kniga. ISBN 978-5-902863-16-8. Page 70.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1990 Arkansas Amendment 3
  • Comment: The first hook is very long and might be declined but I don't know how to shorten it. So I made two other hooks in advance.

Improved to Good Article status by Simongraham (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 20:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: AGF on the offline source. I prefer ALT2. BorgQueen (talk) 11:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)