Template:Did you know nominations/Stanley Bish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fram (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Stanley Bish[edit]

Created by Liam E. Bekker (talk). Self-nominated at 20:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC).

 • Some issues found.

    • This article is new and was created on 19:48, 01 September 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2455 characters
    • Paragraphs [2] (Bish's ... JC.) in this article lack a citation.
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (0.0% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 87 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 137 characters
    • Liam E. Bekker has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 4 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment: I have now added a reference to paragraph 2. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Created within seven days, and is long enough. QPQ isn't needed. Low chance of copyvio, with no close paraphrasing. Hooks are neutral, short and cited to reliable sources. They're cited to an Dutch language source but I'll accept in good faith. I prefer ALT1. MWright96 (talk) 13:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)