Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Statcast

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  21:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Statcast

[edit]

5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk) and ScribbleNote (talk). Nominated by Muboshgu (talk) at 18:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article has been expanded from 145 chars to 2575 chars since 16:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC), a 17.76-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2575 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 92.5% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • Some overall issues detected
    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 103 characters
    • Muboshgu has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

  • I'm impressed with the bot. I'll do a QPQ tomorrow. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:11, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  • @Muboshgu: I'm so glad you wrote this article. Would you consider something more hooky for the average reader, like how the system works or the player feats it can measure? Yoninah (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Sure, I'll take a look at what can be said. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Okay, I'm belatedly back after getting busy IRL. I added some records to the article, so here are some ALTs...
  • ALT2 is too long, isn't it? Hence, ALT4. I'm open to any rewrites. Images can be added for those players, too. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Muboshgu, ALT2 is 176 characters, under the max of 200. So it's legal as is. Since I don't know what "exit velocity" is, that limits its interest, however. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review needed by human reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  • This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. I have struck ALT0 as uninteresting. I think ALT5 is the best of the remaining hooks, though the others are all cited as well. The article is neutral and does not seem to have any copyright problems. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)