Template:Did you know nominations/Steelhouse Lane police station
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:56, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Steelhouse Lane police station
[edit]- ... that Steelhouse Lane police station (pictured) used to have its own bar?
- Reviewed: California Chrome
Created by Pigsonthewing (talk). Self nominated at 16:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC).
- Everything checks out fine, but you need to add another 200 characters worth of prose. It's currently not at the minimum 1500 requirement. Either you need to add more info or it won't be eligible to qualify. — ₳aron 12:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- I added another fact from the Heritage listing to get this to (barely) 1500 characters—another reviewer should validate. I love the hook, by the way. Cmprince (talk) 22:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nominator also needs to review someone elses nomination by the looks of it, too. — ₳aron 10:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- I left a note for Andy (User:Pigsonthewing) reminding him of his QPQ. He's active elsewhere in DYK, so I think this just probably slipped his attention. Cmprince (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done, thank you, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- I left a note for Andy (User:Pigsonthewing) reminding him of his QPQ. He's active elsewhere in DYK, so I think this just probably slipped his attention. Cmprince (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nominator also needs to review someone elses nomination by the looks of it, too. — ₳aron 10:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- I added another fact from the Heritage listing to get this to (barely) 1500 characters—another reviewer should validate. I love the hook, by the way. Cmprince (talk) 22:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- This article is long enough (just) and new enough. The image is suitably licensed, and the hook is sourced to a subscription newspaper so is accepted in good faith. I found no policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)