Template:Did you know nominations/Suicides for eviction in Spain
The following is an archived discussion of Suicides for eviction in Spain's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: rejected by —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 06:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC).
No activity, and this article just doesn't make sense anymore after the move. Regardless, nobody seems to be willing to work on it.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Suicides for eviction in Spain[edit]
- ... that forced foreclosure is the main cause of suicide in Spain?
*... that in Spain more than 517 evictions take place daily?
*... that 34% of suicides in Spain are somehow related to evictions?
*... that suicide in Spain is the main cause of violent death, and one of its main reasons is foreclosure?
Created/expanded by Nafield (talk). Self nominated at 08:21, 3 April 2013 (UTC).
- Hooks 1 and 3 appear to be contradicted by the third paragraph of the article, and if the Spanish national statistical agency doesn't think its possible to come up with reliable statistics on this matter I don't see why a lobby group's assessment deserves to be given much credence. Nick-D (talk) 10:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- National Institute of Statistics can't analyze those data because problems with the eviction law are something recent (lobby group Stop Desahucios is active since 2008, first national-level debates in 2012, last suicide rate data from 2007). Also, what about the 2nd hook? Any problem with the article? Sorry if my English isn't good. P.S.: Just added a 4th hook. Nafield (talk • contribs) 12:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've copyedited it a bit for you, but some of the "refs" are wordpress and campaigning websites, they should be replaced with more reliable refs. Valenciano (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I have removed the first 'verify credibility' since I found another more reliable source. As for the second one, I think it makes no sense. The PAH's (Plataforma de Afectados por la Hipoteca) statements are refered by the official web of the PAH, the Wordpress redirects to a .com webpage. Maybe it was their old site, when there wasn't that much coverage of suicides for evictions. Finally, what's the problem with the third 'verify credibility'? AlertaDigital is a realiable source. Nafield (talk • contribs) 20:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- P.S: I have replaced the 2nd reference. Nafield (talk • contribs) 20:45, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've copyedited it a bit for you, but some of the "refs" are wordpress and campaigning websites, they should be replaced with more reliable refs. Valenciano (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- National Institute of Statistics can't analyze those data because problems with the eviction law are something recent (lobby group Stop Desahucios is active since 2008, first national-level debates in 2012, last suicide rate data from 2007). Also, what about the 2nd hook? Any problem with the article? Sorry if my English isn't good. P.S.: Just added a 4th hook. Nafield (talk • contribs) 12:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
The concerns listed on the {{Orphan}} template need to be addressed, and the references need to be formatted more properly; use {{cite web}} and {{cite news}}, please. —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 08:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
I have deliberately renamed the article to Suicide in Spain. Therefore, the article should broaden its scope of suicides in Spain. --George Ho (talk) 17:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
