Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Super Connected

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BorgQueen talk 10:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Super Connected

  • ... that Super Connected, the new album by Tim Arnold, was banned by Apple for a track about an 'iHead', that was narrated by Stephen Fry? Source: "A Vision Pro parody ad on an album featuring actor Stephen Fry has been banned from an album on Apple Music. The spoof ad for an iHead product was actually created some four years before Apple actually launched a headset" - 9to5mac.com - https://9to5mac.com/2023/07/05/vision-pro-parody-banned/
    • Reviewed: (optional)
    • Comment: I'm autistic and found this complicated to do but I was told by an experienced Wikipedian to give it a try. I hope I've done it correctly. Sorry if I haven't. Martin

Created by 23M23 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Super Connected; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Interesting hook, article itself is well sourced, and neutral. I made some minor copy edits. As a new DYK nominator, 23M23 does not need to review other DYK hooks. I saw elsewhere, they wanted to add an image, which would not be possible, because the home page does not allow fair use images, which most music albums are. This hook itself is ready to go. Congratulations 23M23! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 09:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
@Shushugah: You cannot approve an article without reviewing it for possible copyright violations (of the prose, not just the images) or close paraphrasing. Also...are you sure about the sourcing for this article? In other words, are you comfortable that all sources cited in the article would pass WP:RS? Or do some of them need to be removed and better sources found? Cielquiparle (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for pinging me! I forgot to do copyvio check earlier. Using earwig, I checked the 10 possible copyright violations. Majority of them are false positives, due to long quotes that are correctly cited being found as matches. After confirming that the news sources were written before the entry (eliminating citogenesis possibility) was added to Wikipedia,
  • I do conclude that that Diva Magazine copies sentences verbatim instead of resummarizing the source. Please have a look at this 23M23 and ping me when done.
  • I also assessed whether the Medium blog sources written by subject of article are WP:UNDUE/self PROMO. I think they're used in a DUE/reasonable way within the article, but it would be preferable to replace with secondary sourcing. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 08:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Issues need to be fixed. Will move to WP:DYKN. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Nominator has not edited since last month and issues remain unaddressed. Marking for closure as abandoned. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)