Template:Did you know nominations/Sutton 58
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Sutton 58
- ... that after plans for the Sutton 58 skyscraper prompted a height limit for the surrounding area, construction went ahead anyway? Source: [Hurowitz, Noah (October 22, 2015). "Skyscraper Foes Raising Money to Fund Review for Sutton Place Rezoning Plan". DNAinfo.] (2) Colman, Michelle (June 27, 2018). "City says work can resume on Sutton Place's controversial 800-foot tower". 6sqft
- ALT1:... that the Sutton 58 skyscraper was built even though its developer filed for bankruptcy and its plans directly prompted a height limit for the neighborhood? Source: Same as above
- Reviewed: Meme stock
- Comment: QPQ pending. Not too many interesting hooks here that I can think of sadly.
Created by Quantocius Quantotius (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 23:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC).
- Decided to review this first as I plan to do a DYK hook myself and will need to do a QPQ.
- Hooks look ok, article looks new, but will suggest a bit of rephrasing:
- ATL2: That despite the height limit imposed in the neighbourhood where the Sutton 58 skyscraper is to be built, construction went ahead anyway?
- ATL3: That despite the developer filing for bankruptcy and the height limit in the neighbourhood, construction of the Sutton 58 skyscraper went ahead anyway?
--ZKang123 (talk) 12:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- @ZKang123: Thanks for the review. The height limit was imposed because of Sutton 58 (which is actually being built, rather than just being planned.) But if you think that height-limit detail is not important, then ALT2 or ALT3 may work. I've also done a QPQ now. Epicgenius (talk) 00:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)