Template:Did you know nominations/Suzuki reaction

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 00:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Suzuki reaction

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Suzuki reaction is a greener alternative for synthesis reactions because it uses water and less toxic boronic acids?

• Comment: via sandbox at User:Organic Chemist 19/sandbox

5x expanded by Educatefreechemistry (talk), Organic Chemist 19 (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 07:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC).

• This article is new enough and expanded enough, and it utilizes appropriate sources which are internally cited within the text. There are no copyvios, and the hook's content is sourced and verifiable. A QPQ review is not required. -- Caponer (talk) 04:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

• This article was already self-nominated by Educatefreechemistry (talk · contribs) at 06:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC). Please address the concerns raised by Thingg (talk · contribs) on the other nom template (please see below on T:TDYK). --PFHLai (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)