The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 10:45, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Overall: A neat, little article which is just long enough (1554 characters) to qualify. New enough, fully sourced and good use of source material, the hook is good and verified. It's a shame we can't use the article photograph, but I see it's not 'free' so I guess that rules it out. I think this is GTG. Bermicourt (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
A neat, little article which is just long enough (1554 characters) to qualify. New enough, fully sourced and good use of source material, the hook is good and verified. It's a shame we can't use the article photograph, but I see it's not 'free' so I guess that rules it out. I think this is GTG. Bermicourt (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)