Template:Did you know nominations/The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Improved to Good Article status by Some Dude From North Carolina (talk). Self-nominated at 00:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC).

  • Substantial article, meeting of GA criteria implicates DYK pass. Article was nominated within 7 days of passing GA. Nominator is QPQ exempt. Hook is interesting enough (AGF on offline source), though I would remove "(aka The Ugly)" as the reference is somewhat lost on the reader with the name of the film coming after its inference. Morgan695 (talk) 04:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote, but tagged one paragraph that lacks any cite, per Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Some Dude From North Carolina: Thank you. I'm noticing that a number of book cites lack page numbers. I added one for the hook ref. Could you add the page numbers for the other books you cite? (I'm surprised this passed GA like this.) Yoninah (talk) 18:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Some Dude From North Carolina Do you intend to cite the page numbers? Please let us know so that we can know if we should close the nomination or not. SL93 (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Restoring tick. SL93 (talk) 00:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)