Template:Did you know nominations/The Inbetweeners 2

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

The Inbetweeners 2[edit]

(

)

... that the director of the Australian-set film The Inbetweeners 2 considered filming it in South Africa in order to save money?

ALT1: ~~... that the British comedy film The Inbetweeners 2 was blamed for a craze of deliberate defecation in swimming pools?~~
Reviewed: Corey Hawkins

Improved to Good Article status by The Almightey Drill (talk). Self-nominated at 08:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC).

New enough as promoted to GA on 20 May, long enough at 16,949 characters, neutral and hooks and article are well sourced and QPQ done. Would go with ALT 1. Good to go.Blethering Scot 16:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

I've checked the sources and something doesn't smell right (if you'll pardon the wording) about ALT1. Just when and where was this alleged "craze"? Who is this "travel expert" (or "travel law expert") Nick Harris? EEng (talk) 04:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Can i apologise I never checked the ALT and this is not the one I meant to approve. The approved Hook was the first one and it is definitely sourced. As for Nick Harris a google search shows a fair amount of news articles he is quoted in including The Sunday Times on a variety of travel issues. He is head of travel law at Simpson Millar’s and appears according to his bio to previously of been a defendant lawyer for Thomas Cook, Airtours, Going Places and Direct Holidays. Safe to say he is probably considered an expert in that field. Don't see an issue with its use in the article.Blethering Scot 18:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Struck ALT1 due to the above commentary. Given the above, would like a second opinion on the original hook and the review as a whole; new reviewer can reissue the tick if all is well. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Hook cited and faithful to source. Earwigs comes up with a copyvio but I suspect this website has lifted the plot from the wikipedia page. Although much of the plot appeared suddenly here on 7 August 2014, the umovies page looks like a later version of WP plot, hence my reasoning for it going that way. The rest of the websites look ok. good to go. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)